The interesting thing is I have no idea what Iam doing.
And of course I think Iam doing something good.
And Iam right Iam really doing a good thing.
And If I was wrong I would only be adding to the trouble people have.
And there is plenty of toruble.
But I can't add one little thing to peoples troubles.
And I can only do them good.
And that is what I should believe.
If Iam to write more because I should be convinced that I first do no harm.
And Iam not certain about that.
And everyone who is not certain has to have faith that what they mean for good won't be turned to evil.
And it my faith that has changed everything.
Because I did not know why I was doing a thing.
And now I think I dod understand.
Although I may be wrong.
But regardless of that I think I know the truth.
About why Einstein is wrong.
And of course there is no truth about why Einstein is wrong.
And there really is a good explaination of why his maths doesn't work.
For all the other theories that have to make sense as well.
They all have to be non contradiction.
And only Einsteins thoery has to be contradiction since it makes one of everything.
And you can't make one of everything without having contradictions.
But they are small.
And in fact they are very large.
And very many.
And they don't make sense.
Unless we complelety change the foundation of mathematics.
And that is what we have done.
And we have left the foundation as Aristotle and tried to prove Einsteins theory with Aristotle and of course this doesn't work.
Einstein and Aristotle are two different things.
That means Einstein and ordinary mathematics are two different things.
And there are problems ordinary maths breaks down at the big bang Einsteins thoery doesn't apply.
But we can add the the third equation and then everything is one.
BUt does that truely explain why Einstein is right.
Monday, May 12, 2008
RICHARD THOMAS- A MAN WITH EINSTEINS MISSION.
Garrett Lise had his theory then he wrote his book.That inspires me to write my book about a completed theory.
Because when I wrote before I didn't know what I was doing.
I didn't have any idea where it would end up.
Now I don't even know what I intended in the first place.
Because I have a much better theory that energy is greater than.
As a matter of fact it is the same theory only mass is greater than.
Because for energy to balance with mass mass has to be greater than energy simply because all of the mass will not ever be converted to energy.
Some must be lost in conversion.
So mass keeps getting more massive.
And that is just it I have completed my theory so now I don't want to talk about it.
But that is silly.
It is obvious that with each generation of universes mass must become more massive.
Because energy is lost each time.
And that doesn't make sense even to me.
But assume it is right it can be a guess that is better than some peoples calculations.
Energy is required for outer space that is from another dimension.
And maybe that is inner space and it is exactly that.
But energy is not required if it is evolution.
And to balance 2+2=4 the universes must become more massive as you approach the begining of time.
And if that isn't right and I haven't doubted until now.
The mass and the energy of the big crunch and the big bang must be identical.
And identical means the unviverse doesn't become more massive but energy is not lost.
And it is so eventually we would reach infinite energy.
And the alterntive is that we would reach infinite mass.
And that makes perfect sense mathematically.
Indeed it is a mathematical model of the unvierse.
And the fact that it begins with A Godel universe means everything.
That it is positivist.
It just happens that a Godel unviverse fits my facts it begins with a non contradiction.
That is maths that is 2+2=4.
And it ends in a big crunch that it is a contradiction.
That is maths taht is 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
That is 1/3 BOSE+ 1/3 BOSE+ 1/3 FERMI/DIRAC= 1 BOSE EINSTEIN CONDENSATE.
And if this equation is true that the unviverse may have begin with a bose Einstein condenstate.
And it may have applications for physics.
because we may be able to make a fermi dirac condensate.
And it si juts the opposite we add two parts fermi dirac to one part Bose Einstein.
And a unviverse that is Godel cannot begin with a non contradiction.
And everything is saying that a contradictory universe can begin with a non contradiction.
So the universe prior to the big crunch would be a non contradictory universe like our own.
It is a circle where there are opposites.
And every circle is two opposites.
So thats the explaination.
And you haven't understood.
And I don't think another ten pages would help even a little bit.
Because the unviverse cannot be evolutionary because it becomes too massive.
It must be creationary science it must have started with a big Zap.
A big zap of energy from another dimension makes the two universes balance.
2+2=4.
Otherwise we would have to say that 2+2 doesn't equal four exactly that a little bit of energy is lost.
And a little may prove to be a lot.
So it might be a big difference to mathematics.
But we can assume 2+2 does equal four and the unvierses become more massive as time approaches zero.
And it must approach zero if it reaches infinity.
And then can be rounded off to zero.
I don't have any thng more to say for today.
And I do say it will be nice proving the theory right.
Because I have always begun the other way.
And now I know what Iam trying to prove.
But If my theory proves to be wrong then all my work is not worthless.
And that is like newton it is still a good thoery.
It fits the mathematics maybe better than any thoery every has.
It is Einsteins mission to prove everything is one.
And Iam Richard Thomas and Iam a man with Einsteins mission.
Only I can't prove it it be one.
I have to prove it to be 2+2=4.
If we have just one unviverse that the same applies to balance the equation we have to get energy from another dimension.
And it is easy to prove creation but it not easy with one universe to prove evolution.
Because when I wrote before I didn't know what I was doing.
I didn't have any idea where it would end up.
Now I don't even know what I intended in the first place.
Because I have a much better theory that energy is greater than.
As a matter of fact it is the same theory only mass is greater than.
Because for energy to balance with mass mass has to be greater than energy simply because all of the mass will not ever be converted to energy.
Some must be lost in conversion.
So mass keeps getting more massive.
And that is just it I have completed my theory so now I don't want to talk about it.
But that is silly.
It is obvious that with each generation of universes mass must become more massive.
Because energy is lost each time.
And that doesn't make sense even to me.
But assume it is right it can be a guess that is better than some peoples calculations.
Energy is required for outer space that is from another dimension.
And maybe that is inner space and it is exactly that.
But energy is not required if it is evolution.
And to balance 2+2=4 the universes must become more massive as you approach the begining of time.
And if that isn't right and I haven't doubted until now.
The mass and the energy of the big crunch and the big bang must be identical.
And identical means the unviverse doesn't become more massive but energy is not lost.
And it is so eventually we would reach infinite energy.
And the alterntive is that we would reach infinite mass.
And that makes perfect sense mathematically.
Indeed it is a mathematical model of the unvierse.
And the fact that it begins with A Godel universe means everything.
That it is positivist.
It just happens that a Godel unviverse fits my facts it begins with a non contradiction.
That is maths that is 2+2=4.
And it ends in a big crunch that it is a contradiction.
That is maths taht is 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE.
That is 1/3 BOSE+ 1/3 BOSE+ 1/3 FERMI/DIRAC= 1 BOSE EINSTEIN CONDENSATE.
And if this equation is true that the unviverse may have begin with a bose Einstein condenstate.
And it may have applications for physics.
because we may be able to make a fermi dirac condensate.
And it si juts the opposite we add two parts fermi dirac to one part Bose Einstein.
And a unviverse that is Godel cannot begin with a non contradiction.
And everything is saying that a contradictory universe can begin with a non contradiction.
So the universe prior to the big crunch would be a non contradictory universe like our own.
It is a circle where there are opposites.
And every circle is two opposites.
So thats the explaination.
And you haven't understood.
And I don't think another ten pages would help even a little bit.
Because the unviverse cannot be evolutionary because it becomes too massive.
It must be creationary science it must have started with a big Zap.
A big zap of energy from another dimension makes the two universes balance.
2+2=4.
Otherwise we would have to say that 2+2 doesn't equal four exactly that a little bit of energy is lost.
And a little may prove to be a lot.
So it might be a big difference to mathematics.
But we can assume 2+2 does equal four and the unvierses become more massive as time approaches zero.
And it must approach zero if it reaches infinity.
And then can be rounded off to zero.
I don't have any thng more to say for today.
And I do say it will be nice proving the theory right.
Because I have always begun the other way.
And now I know what Iam trying to prove.
But If my theory proves to be wrong then all my work is not worthless.
And that is like newton it is still a good thoery.
It fits the mathematics maybe better than any thoery every has.
It is Einsteins mission to prove everything is one.
And Iam Richard Thomas and Iam a man with Einsteins mission.
Only I can't prove it it be one.
I have to prove it to be 2+2=4.
If we have just one unviverse that the same applies to balance the equation we have to get energy from another dimension.
And it is easy to prove creation but it not easy with one universe to prove evolution.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)